The simplest approach is to check every single point. Compute the distance from the user's location to every restaurant in the database, keep the ones that are close enough, and throw away the rest.
Марина Совина (ночной редактор)
。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
stack.push(cur);
离开县城，这一切都变得不同了。时间似乎是把一切推倒重来。有次路过北京的一座高架桥，我妈指着它说，“看，以前我们就在这住。”我们以前去过的很多地方，都已经随着拆迁消失了。
。服务器推荐对此有专业解读
“제 나이 68세, 어깨 회전근 파열에도 피클볼 전국대회 우승했죠”[양종구의 100세 시대 건강법]
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?，详情可参考safew官方版本下载